![]() ![]() These results as well as some discussion about the potential (both technical and financial) of Honeywell's gas turbine engine simulators are presented in this paper. gain potential of employing the gas turbine engine simulator. Recently studies have illustrated the cost vs. Today, they are used to perform many tasks that could previously only be accomplished on an actual engine test stand. However, as the simulators increased in sophistication, their role in controller testing also increased. Individual component performance characteristics are typically. Although this capability added value, it was difficult to access financial savings gained by using the simulators. Current commercial state of the art engine simulation software is of a low fidelity. In the early years, simulators were built solely as a tool for use in testing the hardware interface of the controllers and didn't significantly reduce the time performing tests on development engines. The aim of this work is to choose a proper technique of CRN set-up and apply it for engineering tasks with the software tool LOGEsoft ReactorNetwork. This work outlines these evolutionary approaches and gives light to Honeywell's successful approach to simulator design and implementation. However, the underlying philosophy behind how these simulators are used is the same and unique to Honeywell. Although at the same company, these paths implemented two unique approaches in their development. Namely, the simulators for testing the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) controllers and the simulators for testing the propulsion engine controllers. ![]() At Honeywell, this evolution has taken place on parallel paths. Over the past 20 years, gas turbine engine simulators have evolved into an integral tool for testing and certifying the electronic controllers of gas turbine engines. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |